Town of Turner, Maine

Planning Board Minutes

February 27, 2008

 

 

1 CALL TO ORDER

Chairman, Jeffrey Timberlake called the meeting to order at 7:01pm.  Those Members present were Mr. Timberlake, Shirley Twitchell, Raymond Lavoie, R. Edward Morris, Margaret Imber and Roy Nickerson.  Board Member Mark Morris was not present.  Planner, John Maloney was present this evening.  CEO, Roger Williams was also present this evening.   

 

2               PUBLIC HEARINGS:

 

PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS

 

Mr. Timberlake opened the Public Hearings at 7:02pm.

 

Mr. Timberlake addressed those in the audience and stated that Mr. Maloney would review the proposed Ordinance Amendments.  After this review there would be time for questions and answers.  After the discussion of the proposed amendments if the Board Members agreed to any changes they would be made and the final proposed Ordinance Amendments would be presented at the Town meeting for acceptance by the citizens of Turner.  Mr. Timberlake then asked Mr. Maloney to review the Ordinance Amendments. 

 

Mr. Maloney stated that the amendment to Section 3.I.6 would read as follows:  In the Commercial I, Commercial II, Village and Agricultural/Industrial Districts each principal structure does not need be so situated and constructed to be capable of being sold or transferred separately with a conforming lot.  Provided that the required lot size, and frontages for each principal structure, required setbacks, maximum building coverage, maximum impervious surface ratio and minimum pervious ratio as set forth in Section 3.I Bilk and Space Standards are met. 

 

Mr. Maloney then stated that the amendment to Section 4.B would read as follows:

 

2.      A statement indicating how those that use the right-of-way to access their residences will provide for adequate maintenance provision for the right-of-way. 

 

Mr. Maloney then stated that a new Section 4.DD with regards to Planned Unit Development, a.k.a. PUD, was being proposed as a new Ordinance.  Mr. Maloney explained this new Section with regards to Purposes, Permitted Districts and Procedure.  Mr. Maloney stated that a requirement of 5 acres of land would be needed; however less could be considered.  Mr. Maloney then stated that the MMA attorneys are reviewing this new proposed Ordinance. 

 

Mr. Maloney continued and stated that the amendment to Section 5.D.4 would read as follows:  For the purposed of this section the “applicant” shall be considered an individual, firm, company or partnership of any type including the majority shareholder or partner.  Mr. Maloney then stated that the MMA attorneys are also reviewing this wording.

 

Mr. Maloney then stated the that the amendment to Section 8, Definitions, would read as follows:  A planned unit development is a residential or mixed-use land development which is developed under unified management; is planned as a whole according to comprehensive and detailed plans, including streets, utilities, lots or building sites, open space and preserved natural forests, recreational facilities, and design principles for proposed buildings; is reviewed and approved as a subdivision by the Planning Board and in addition is subject to the requirements of this Section; may be developed in clearly identified stages; and provides for the operation and maintenance of common facilities.  Mr. Maloney also stated that all lots of less than 500 acres shall be considered as lots within the proposed subdivision unless exempted by Title 30A, M.R.S.A. Sections 4401, 4.A.1., 4.B, 4.D and 4.E shall be stricken.  Mr. Maloney also stated that under Tract, or Parcel, of Land after September 22, 1971 be added. 

 

Mr. Maloney stated that a request has been made to amend the Zoning Map.  Mr. Maloney explained these proposed changes to the Zoning Map stating that these changes would primarily affect the zoning at Crosswinds Air (formerly Twitchell’s Airport).  These changes would allow the Commercial Use to be changed to Rural I, which would then allow residential uses. 

 

Mr. Maloney then reviewed the proposed Subdivision Ordinance Amendments.  Mr. Maloney stated the amendment to Article III, Definitions would strike except as provided for below and also strike All lots of less than 500 acres shall be considered as lots within the proposed subdivision unless exempted by Title     30-A, M.R.S.A. Section 4401.4 A.1, 4.B., 4.D., and 4.E.  Mr. Maloney also stated that under Tract, or Parcel, of land after September 22, 1971 be added.

 

Mr. Maloney then reviewed the amendments to Article VI, 6.2, Procedure, Article VII, 7.1 Procedure, and Article VIII, 8.1, Procedure and stated that the following would be added to each section:  For the purposed of this section the “applicant” shall be considered as individual, firm, company or partnership of any type including the majority shareholder or partner.  Mr. Mike Gotto then stated that he did not agree with this wording.  Mr. Timberlake stated that the wording of the Proposed Subdivision Amendments are being reviewed by MMA.

 

Mr. Maloney then stated that the next proposal is to amend Article 10.2, Open Space Provisions, by adding a subsection E.  This addition would read as follows:  The proposed subdivision shall provide safe pedestrian access within the subdivision and interconnection with existing facilities on abutting properties including connection and/or preservation of existing snowmobile trails to accomplish the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.

 

M. Maloney then stated that the proposed amendment to Article 10.7.b, Water Supply, would read as follows:  2.  Based on the recommendation of the Fire Department the Board may require the subdivider to install systems to provide water for fire fighting purposes or to pay for such systems.   

 

Mr. Maloney then explained the proposed changes to Article 10.9, Phosphorous Export, with regards to the Lake Protection Table. 

 

Mr. Maloney then stated that the proposed amendment to Article 10.15, Traffic Conditions would strike or Mixed Use.

 

Mr. Maloney then stated the proposed amendments to the Planning Board Ordinance.  Section 2.D should be amended to state including resignation by absence.  Section 8 should have State law stricken and add Title 30-A MRSA Section 3002.

 

Mr. Maloney also stated that the Flood Plain Ordinance would be brought up to compliance. 

 

Mr. Timberlake stated that MMA approval is needed before the Planning Board can vote on these Proposed Ordinance Amendments.  Mr. Maloney then stated that any changes to these Amendments would be discussed at the March Planning Board meeting.  Mr. Timberlake asked if there were any comment or concerns.  Mr. Mark Duguay stated that he had an issue with the minimum lot size issue of 5 acres under the new PUD Ordinance.  There was some discussion regarding this issue.  It was suggested that each area be looked at individually.  The Planning Board agreed with this suggestion. It was also suggested to look at alternative energy for the future. 

 

The tape recording was turned off for approximately 1 minute, so gentlemen from the outside could ask that a certain car be removed, which was blocking him in.

 

GLOBAL TOWER PARTNERS LLC

 

Ms. Maureen Butler from Global Tower Partners is representing this project this evening.  This project coordination is by:  ATC Realty Inc.  Ms. Butler stated that this new cell tower would be located on Mountainside Drive.  This property is 82 acres and the proposed location is in the back corner.  The cell tower would be a 190-foot tower with a 237.5-foot fall zone.  The driveway will be 1,850 feet long.  Ms. Butler stated that Mr. Kurt Youland owns this property.  The leased area will be 100’ x 100’.  There will be easements around the fall zones.  There will be a 75’ x 75’ 8 foot high chain link fence with barbed wire at the top.  Two antennas will be free to the town to be used for 911 communications.  There is enough room for 6 wireless service providers, with 1 application already having been submitted.  There will be no lights on the tower.  The only lighting will be down shielded light on the base structure, which will be on a timer.  Ms. Butler then explained the Radio Frequency maps which indicated that this location is a good choice for the tower.  Mr. Timberlake then stated that Teague Hill Estates, which is where this tower will be erected, is located off of Route 117.  Mr. Cyrus Arsenault asked what the need/justification was for this tower.  Ms. Butler responded that this area is lacking wireless coverage.  Mr. Phil Daigle asked if any other alternate sites had been considered.  Ms. Marcia Graham asked what the distance was to the closest house lot.  Ms. Butler stated that she believed it was 237.5 feet from the closest lot.  Mr. Peter Cutter asked if a balloon test could be done to show what the visual impact would be.  Mr. Arsenault then stated that Teague Hill Estates has a deed covenant that states no residence is allowed to have a commercial vehicle parked on any property.  Mr. Arsenault wanted to know how this covenant could then allow for commercial vehicles to travel this road to construct the tower.  Mr. Gotto stated that this road is a public road and that there are no restrictions as to what types of vehicles are permitted to travel on this road.  There was then a discussion regarding the parcels of land that were not in the subdivision plan.  These lots were given to relatives as gifts.  Mr. Gotto stated that on the original subdivision plan one lot was to deed to Kelvin Youland and one lot was to be deeded to Karen Youland.  Mr. Gotto stated that these deeds were drawn up, notarized and witnessed; however they were never recorded.  Mr. Gotto stated that the deeds were intended to be recorded but was never done.  Mr. Arsenault stated that this road is located in a residential area and now commercial vehicles will be allowed to travel on it.  Mr. Timberlake stated that after the tower was erected there should be only 10-12 trips per month by a van type vehicle.  Mr. Daigle stated that he believes this tower will devalue the property values in this area by approximately $50,000.  Ms. Graham asked if there was any type of removal bond.  Mr. Timberlake stated that the town does require a removal bond.  Ms. Graham then stated that there is already damage to this road and wanted to know who will pay to have the road repaired if there is additional damage.  Ms. Butler stated that the construction vehicles never exceed the posted weight loads.  The comment was made that since this is a public road the town would be responsible for any repairs.  Mr. Daigle then asked if the utilities would be underground or overhead.  Ms. Butler stated that the proposal is for overhead.  Mr. Daigle then stated that the utilities in this development are now underground.  Ms. Butler stated that there is a possibility of having the utilities underground, but that would have to be discussed with CMP.  There was then a discussion regarding who owns the land and whom the tower would be leased to.  Mr. Timberlake stated that this issue has nothing to do with the Planning Board.

 

The Public Hearings were closed at 8:04pm.

 

3              OLD BUSINESS:

A             PLEASANT VIEW ACRES-SUBDIVISION AMENDMENT-

                FINDINGS OF FACTS

Mr. Maloney read the following:  Therefore, the amendment #4 request of Brian and Linda Gallagher and Ronald and Brenda Bussiere, to relocate lot lines 1, 2, 13 and 14 as described in the findings above is hereby approved with the following condition.

 

This amendment is limited only to the changes in lot lines of Lots 1, 2, 13 and 14 with Lot 13 having a 50-foot right of way.

 

Ms. Twitchell made a motion to accept the Findings of Fact with the Condition as stated above.  Mr. Lavoie seconded the motion.  The Board Members voted unanimously to accept the Findings of Facts. 

 

 

 

B                RIVER VIEW ACRES SUBDIVISION-PRELIMINARY PLAN-

                   FINDINGS OF FACTS

Mr. Maloney reviewed the Preliminary Plan Findings of Facts with Conditions Approval 1 through 5.  Ms. Twitchell made a motion to accept the Preliminary Plan Findings of Facts with Conditions of Approval 1 through 5.  Mr. Lavoie seconded the motion.  The Board Members voted unanimously the Findings of Facts.

 

C                 RIVER VIEW ACRES SUBDIVISION-FINAL PLAN

Mr. Maloney reviewed the Application Completeness Checklist Final Plan Major Subdivision.  Mr. Maloney stated that all items had been found complete and that Item 20 had been discussed and an agreement had been reached between the applicants and the Road Commissioner.   Mr. Maloney then reviewed the extra checklist items that he had added and stated that they were all found complete.  Ms. Twitchell made a motion to accept the Application Completeness Checklist Final Plan Major Subdivision.  Mr. Lavoie seconded the motion.  The Board Members voted unanimously.  Mr. Maloney then reviewed the Final Plan Subdivision Approval with Conditions of Approval 1 through 9 and Other Conditions of Approval 1 through 7.  Ms. Twitchell made a motion to accept the Final Plan Subdivision with Conditions of Approval 1 through 9 and Other Conditions of Approval 1 through 7.  Mr. Lavoie seconded the motion.  The Board Members voted unanimously to accept the River View Acres Final Plan.  A representative from Main-Land Development Consultants, Inc. is leaving the plans to be signed by Mr. Timberlake.  The plans will be signed after the town receives the $1,000.00 check required from the applicant. 

 

D                     GLOBAL TOWER PARTNERSHIP LLC-SITE PLAN REVIEW

Mr. Mike Gotto addressed the Planning Board and discussed the fact that the deeds drawn up to Kelvin Youland and Karen Youland had never been recorded.  Mr. Gotto stated that the deeds were legal and a mistake had been made by not recording them.  Mr. Maloney then stated that he feels that Mr. Timberlake should not have lengthy conversations regarding this issue with Mr. Gotto without the other Board Members knowledge.  Mr. Timberlake stated that he does not agree with Mr. Maloney and that any discussions he has had with Mr. Gotto would certainly be of no gain to Mr. Timberlake.  There was then a lengthy discussion regarding the fact that the deeds were never recorded as intended and as dictated by the original subdivision plan.  There was then some discussion regarding the 5-year rule on splitting lots.  Again the discussion turned to the recording of the deeds and the fact that it will be 5 years on April 23, 2008 that this subdivision was approved.  The discussion turned to the fact that Mr. Kurt Youland has been paying taxes on this property for the past 5 years, so didn’t he realize that he still owned it?  Since Mr. Kurt Youland does not have right title and interest the question arose as to how Global Tower can approach Mr. Kurt Youland with a lease agreement?  All said documents appear to be very confusing.  Again there was continued discussion regarding the recording of these deeds.  There was then a comment made by Mr. Arsenault that his conversations with Mr. Kurt Youland never led he or any of his neighbors to believe that anything major would be done with the remaining land in this area.  The comment was made that the land being deeded to Mr. Kelvin Youland was for the construction of a retirement home.  After continued discussion about who owns the land Mr. Timberlake asked Ms. Butler if a balloon test could be done.  Ms. Butler stated that her company would be willing to conduct a balloon test and that she would like at least one Board Member present and that all of the neighbors were also welcome.  There was then a discussion regarding how this balloon test would be conducted and the possibility of a crane having to be used.  Mr. Arsenault asked why a tower on the top of a mountain would not require lights.  Ms. Butler stated that so far the FAA is not requiring lighting.  Mr. Arsenault then asked what type of wireless companies would be using this tower.  Ms. Butler responded wireless carriers/telephone communications.  The question was asked if microwave dishes could be installed on the tower.  The answer was, yes, that could happen.  The Application Checklist was scheduled to be reviewed this evening; however it was agreed upon by the Planning Board that the Application Checklist would not be reviewed.  The neighbors agreed that they had many questions for Mr. Kurt Youland.  Mr. Timberlake suggested that the neighbors meet face to face with Mr. Youland.  Ms. Butler then stated that she was unaware of the extent of some of the issues discussed this evening and that these issues would need to be resolved before moving forward.  There was then a discussion among the Planning Board Members regarding the deed issues.  It was agreed upon by all that attorney review would be needed in order to iron out all of the issues associated with the deeds and the original subdivision.  Ms. Imber stated that two issues need to be determined:

 

The Planning Board/Town needs to make sure the Teague Hill Estates Subdivision is in conformance.

If there is any liability to the town.

 

Mr. Timberlake then appointed Ms. Imber to work with Mr. Maloney, Mr. Gotto and the town attorney.  Mr. Timberlake stated that he would contact the town manager, Eva Leavitt, to start the ball rolling with the attorney.  Mr. Timberlake asked Ms. Imber to report back to the Planning Board as soon as possible.  Mr. Timberlake then stated that there will be no further review of this project until the right title and interest issues have been resolved to the Planning Board’s satisfaction.

 

 NEW BUSINESS:

A              MITCH’S AUTO-SKETCH PLAN

Mr. Ronald Michaud is representing this project this evening.  Mr. Michaud stated that he has already built a garage to service 1 to 2 cars per day.  Mr. Michaud is retired and only wants to work approximately 4 hours per day.  Mr. Michaud plans on only running this business for 1 to 1 ½ years.  This business is located on Rout 117 just beyond the cranberry bogs.  It was agreed upon that a site walk was not needed.  A Public Hearing was set for March 12, 2008 at 7:00pm.      

 

5               OTHER BUSINESS

None.

 

REVIEW OF MINUTES FROM JANUARY 9, 2008  

Ms. Twitchell made a motion to accept the Minutes from the January 9, 2008 Planning Board meeting.  Mr. Lavoie seconded the motion.  The Board Members voted 4 in favor and 2 abstentions to accept the January 9, 2008 Minutes.

 

PLANNER ESCROW

No action required.

 

8                CEO REPORT

No action required.

 

      9                ADJOURNMENT

Motion made by Ms. Twitchell for adjournment, unanimously accepted.  The meeting adjourned at 9:27pm.

           

 

      Respectfully submitted by

 Karen Wilcox

      Recording Secretary