Town of
Turner, Maine
Planning Board Minutes
September 14,
2011
1
CALL TO ORDER
Called to order at
7:02pm by Chairman Ms. Margaret Imber. Those Members present were
Ms. Imber, Shirley Twitchell, Joan Bryant-Deschenes,
R. Edward Morris, and Richard Lee.
Mr. Thomas Perkins arrived at 7:10pm.
Board Member Mark Morris was not present.
Planner, John Maloney was present this evening. CEO, Roger Williams was also
present this evening.
2
PUBLIC HEARING-MAINE RSA # 1 INC.-TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
Ms. Imber opened the Public Hearing
at 7:03pm.
Mr.
Robert Gashlin, a Telecommunications Consultant, is
representing this project this evening on behalf of U.S. Cellular. Mr. Gashlin
stated that presently there are 3 towers in the area of the town
office: one located near the
airport, one on Route 117 and one on Streaked
Mountain. Presently there is no cell
coverage in the area of the town office.
This project is proposed to install a 199 foot tower on the
Ronald and Ramona St. Pierre property located at 322
Snell Hill Road.
The proposed road of approximately 2,116 feet will follow the Old Dow Farm Road, which is a
discontinued town road. The
lease will be for a 100 x 100 foot piece of property.
A chain link fence with barbed wire will be installed and the
tower will stand 199 feet tall and be of the lattice type, The FAA
has indicated that there will not be a need for a light on top of the
tower. There will be an equipment
shelter which will have power and telephone service.
It was indicated that the original proposal of a 30 foot right
of way has been changed to a 60 foot right of way.
There was a short discussion regarding the diameter of the
drainage culverts. It was then stated that on
September 10, 2011 a balloon test was performed.
An orange balloon was flown at the height of 199 feet.
Mr. Jaime Robinson, an abutter had concerns about an easement
across his property and also asked if the entrance would be gated. Mr. Gashlin
stated that there would be a culvert installed on this property and
that the entrance would be gated with a metal gate.
Mr. David McLaughlin had some concerns regarding the 60 foot
right of way and the use of ATVs on this property.
Mr. Gashlin stated that the gate to be installed
would be 12 feet wide and it would not give anyone using ATVs
any more opportunities then they had now.
Mrs. Margot Robinson, an abutter, stated that she was
concerned about the dip in the corner of her property and what will
it look like after construction as well as a negative effect on the
property value. Mr. Gashlin stated that he would like to see
conditions stating that U.S. Cellular agrees to ensure that they will
not create any situation that is more detrimental then already
exists. If any negative
situation is created then U.S. Cellular must fix it.
Ms.
Imber closed the Public hearing at 7:24pm.
3
OLD BUSINESS:
A
MAINE RSA #1 INC.-TELECOMMUNICATIONS
FACILITY SITE PLAN REVIEW
Mr.
Robert Gashlin, a Telecommunications Consultant, is
representing this project this evening on behalf of U.S. Cellular. Mr. Maloney stated that a
site walk took place on September 10, 2011, those Board Members in
attendance were Ms. Imber, Mr. Lee as well as Mr. Maloney. Mr. Maloney stated that the
balloon test began at 6:00am. This
balloon test was done in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan with
regards to Scenic Views, primarily in the areas of Upper
Street and Lower Street. Mr. Maloney stated that he
could only see the balloon from Route 117 and he could not see it
close. Mr. Maloney also stated that
he had also used binoculars during this site plan review.
Mr. Maloney then stated that he had hiked up to the site with
Mr. Gashlin. Ms.
Imber and Mr. Lee both stated that they could
not see the balloon from either Upper
Street or Lower
Street. Mr. Gashlin
then distributed photo simulations to the Board Members for their
review. Mr. Maloney then proceeded
to review the Application Completeness Checklist for Site Plan
Review. Mr. Maloney stated that
Items 9, 17, 22, 26, 33, 44 and 52 had been provided.
Mr. Maloney suggested waiving Items 10, 13, 36, 37, 38 and 46. Mr. Maloney then reviewed
some of the Standards associated with this project.
Mr. Maloney began with Section 4.W.4, Specific Standards. Mr. Maloney stated that a
letter regarding Item d. will need to be provided as well as Item p.
being made a Condition of Approval. Items discussed in Section 5,
Abandonment, will be made a Condition of Approval.
Section 6, Security Bonds will also be made a Condition of
Approval. It was then
stated that the property owner will be happy to work with the
Snowmobile Club. There
was then some discussion regarding a Bond for the possible future
removal of the tower by the town.
It was determined that the Town Manager should research what
the amount of this Bond should be. Mr. Lee then stated that he
had concerns regarding the Robinson property and water pooling on
this property. Mr. Maloney stated that he
will add a Condition of Approval that the applicant will fix any
problems should they occur. It was then stated that the
new road would be a private road and that it would not be the
responsibility of the town. Ms. Twitchell made a motion
to waive Items 10, 13, 36, 37, 38 and 46.
Mr. R. Edward Morris seconded the motion.
The Board Members voted unanimously.
Ms. Twitchell then addressed the Board Members, the audience
and Mr. Gashlin and asked if anyone had any
objections to her remaining at the Board table since she was an
abutter. There were no
objections. Ms. Twitchell
made a motion to accept the Application Completeness Checklist for
Site Plan Review as complete. Mr.
R. Edward Morris seconded the motion.
The Board Members voted unanimously to accept the Application
Completeness Checklist for Site Plan Review as complete.
Mr. Perkins asked if there would only be 12 antennas.
Mr. Gashlin stated that the proposal was for 12
antennas on 2 different racks, but that there was space for 3 racks. Ms. Bryant-Deschenes
then asked some questions regarding the Culvert Analysis and
Phosphorous Report. Mr.
Maloney then stated that one of his engineers at AVCOG did have some
questions regarding these reports and that he would have this
engineer conferee with Mr. Gashlins
engineers. There was then
some more discussion regarding the culverts and easements. It was then stated that Ms.
Twitchell and Ms. Bryant-Deschenes will
need to review the audio tapes from any missed meetings in order to
be able to vote on this project. There was then another
discussion regarding drainage issues and the need for a Condition of
Approval regarding these issues.
Ms. Wilcox then asked if Mr. Mark Morris who was not present
this evening should review this meetings audio tape in order to
vote on this project. The
answer was, yes. It was
then stated that drainage issues and bond issues need to be finalized
at the next Planning Board meeting.
Mr. Perkins then again addressed the possibility of additional
antennas on this tower. Mr. Gashlin
then stated that this project is only proposing for 12 antennas;
however there is room for 4 racks, each holding 12 antennas.
Mr. Perkins asked if there were more antennas would there also
be more equipment shelters and generators.
It was sated that the plan already shows 3 equipment shelters. After continued discussion
it was agreed upon by all of the Board Members that they would like
to see photos of a tower with 15 antennas and photos of a tower with
48 antennas.
Recess taken from 8:26pm until 8:28pm.
4
NEW BUSINESS:
NONE
5 CEO
REPORT
No action required.
6
REVIEW OF THE MINUTES FROM AUGUST 10, 2011
Mr. Lee made a motion to accept the August
10, 2011 Minutes. Mr. R.
Edward Morris seconded the motion.
The Board Members voted 4 in favor and 2 abstentions to accept
the August 10, 2011 Minutes. Ms. Twitchell and Mr.
Bryant-Deschenes abstained from voting because they
were not present at the August 10, 2011 Planning Board meeting
7
REVIEW OF PLANNER ESCROW
No action required.
8 OTHER
ITEMS
A
PLANNING BOARD PROCEDURES PRESENTATION
Ms. Imber
made a motion to postpone the Planning Board Procedures Presentation
until the October Planning Board meeting.
Ms. Twitchell seconded the motion.
Mr. Perkins amended the motion to state that the Planning
Board procedures should be reviewed at the October Planning Board
Workshop. The Planning Board Members
voted unanimously to review the Planning Board Procedures
Presentation at the October Planning Board Workshop.
9
ADJOURNMENT
Motion made by Mr. R. Edward Morris for
adjournment, unanimously accepted.
The meeting adjourned at 8:35pm.
Respectfully submitted by
Karen Wilcox